Ten local agents and teams, compared through public evidence rather than a popularity list. Search by need or neighbourhood, check the review signals, and open any score to see the 47 factors and the exact sources behind it.
Evidence reviewed through 16 July 2026. Ratings and review counts are snapshots and can change.
How the ranking works
The model scores 47 evidence points across 10 categories. Review strength carries the largest weight, followed by service fit and customer experience. Identity, review trust, reputation consistency, website trust, authority, social activity and pricing clarity complete the picture. Scores measure the quality of publicly verifiable evidence, not a guarantee of a future transaction.
Evidence was cross-checked across official websites, exact agent or team profiles, transaction-review platforms, brokerage and authority pages, and current social accounts. Platform counts are kept separate because the same client can appear in more than one place.
Ranking snapshot
A quick view of the full list before you filter the detailed profiles.
| Rank | Company | What stands out | Score | Web domain |
|---|
Find the right local fit
Use the slim filters together. Clear them at any time to restore the ranked list.
